请输入关键字
请输入关键字
订购
*国家
中国
美国
中国香港
中国澳门
中国台湾
阿尔巴尼亚
阿尔及利亚
阿根廷
阿拉伯联合酋长国
阿鲁巴
阿曼
阿塞拜疆
阿森松岛
埃及
埃塞俄比亚
爱尔兰
爱沙尼亚
安道尔
安哥拉
安圭拉
安提瓜和巴布达
奥地利
奥兰群岛
澳大利亚
巴巴多斯
巴布亚新几内亚
巴哈马
巴基斯坦
巴拉圭
巴勒斯坦领土
巴林
巴拿马
巴西
白俄罗斯
百慕大
保加利亚
北马里亚纳群岛
贝宁
比利时
冰岛
波多黎各
波兰
波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那
玻利维亚
伯利兹
博茨瓦纳
不丹
布基纳法索
布隆迪
朝鲜
赤道几内亚
丹麦
德国
迪戈加西亚岛
东帝汶
多哥
多米尼加共和国
多米尼克
俄罗斯
厄瓜多尔
厄立特里亚
法国
法罗群岛
法属波利尼西亚
法属圭亚那
法属南部领地
梵蒂冈
菲律宾
斐济
芬兰
佛得角
福克兰群岛
冈比亚
刚果(布)
刚果(金)
哥伦比亚
哥斯达黎加
格恩西岛
格林纳达
格陵兰
格鲁吉亚
古巴
瓜德罗普
关岛
圭亚那
哈萨克斯坦
海地
韩国
荷兰
荷属加勒比区
荷属圣马丁
黑山
洪都拉斯
基里巴斯
吉布提
吉尔吉斯斯坦
几内亚
几内亚比绍
加拿大
加纳
加纳利群岛
加蓬
柬埔寨
捷克
津巴布韦
喀麦隆
卡塔尔
开曼群岛
科科斯(基林)群岛
科摩罗
科索沃
科特迪瓦
科威特
克罗地亚
肯尼亚
库克群岛
库拉索
拉脱维亚
莱索托
老挝
黎巴嫩
立陶宛
利比里亚
利比亚
联合国
列支敦士登
留尼汪
卢森堡
卢旺达
罗马尼亚
马达加斯加
马恩岛
马尔代夫
马耳他
马拉维
马来西亚
马里
马其顿
马绍尔群岛
马提尼克
马约特
毛里求斯
毛里塔尼亚
美国本土外小岛屿
美属萨摩亚
美属维尔京群岛
蒙古
蒙特塞拉特
孟加拉国
秘鲁
密克罗尼西亚
缅甸
摩尔多瓦
摩洛哥
摩纳哥
莫桑比克
墨西哥
纳米比亚
南非
南极洲
南乔治亚和南桑威奇群岛
南苏丹
瑙鲁
尼加拉瓜
尼泊尔
尼日尔
尼日利亚
纽埃
挪威
诺福克岛
帕劳
皮特凯恩群岛
葡萄牙
日本
瑞典
瑞士
萨尔瓦多
萨摩亚
塞尔维亚
塞拉利昂
塞内加尔
塞浦路斯
塞舌尔
沙特阿拉伯
圣巴泰勒米
圣诞岛
圣多美和普林西比
圣赫勒拿
圣基茨和尼维斯
圣卢西亚
圣马丁岛
圣马力诺
圣皮埃尔和密克隆群岛
圣文森特和格林纳丁斯
斯里兰卡
斯洛伐克
斯洛文尼亚
斯瓦尔巴和扬马延
斯威士兰
苏丹
苏里南
所罗门群岛
索马里
塔吉克斯坦
泰国
坦桑尼亚
汤加
特克斯和凯科斯群岛
特里斯坦-达库尼亚群岛
特立尼达和多巴哥
突尼斯
图瓦卢
土耳其
土库曼斯坦
托克劳
瓦利斯和富图纳
瓦努阿图
危地马拉
委内瑞拉
文莱
乌干达
乌克兰
乌拉圭
乌兹别克斯坦
希腊
西班牙
西撒哈拉
新加坡
新喀里多尼亚
新西兰
匈牙利
休达及梅利利亚
叙利亚
牙买加
亚美尼亚
也门
伊拉克
伊朗
以色列
意大利
印度
印度尼西亚
英国
英属维尔京群岛
英属印度洋领地
约旦
越南
赞比亚
泽西岛
乍得
直布罗陀
智利
中非共和国
*省份
*城市
*姓名
*电话
*单位
*职位
*邮箱
*请输入验证码
*验证码
B-hGCGR mice
Strain Name
C57BL/6-Gcgrtm1(GCGR)Bcgen/Bcgen
Common Name  B-hGCGR mice
Background C57BL/6 Catalog number  110105
Aliases 
GGR, GL-R,G, GR
NCBI Gene ID
14527

mRNA expression analysis


from clipboard

Strain specific analysis of GCGR gene expression in WT and B-hGCGR mice by RT-PCR. Mouse GCGR mRNA was detectable only in liver cells of wild type C57BL/6 mice (+/+). Human GCGR mRNA was detectable only in homozygous B-hGCGR mice (H/H) , but not in wild type C57BL/6 mice (+/+). 


Protein expression analysis

from clipboard

Strain specific GCGR expression analysis in homozygous B-hGCGR mice by western blot. Kidney tissue was collected from wild type C57BL/6 mice (+/+) and homozygous B-hGCGR mice (H/H), and analyzed by western blot with anti-GCGR antibody. Mouse GCGR was detectable in wild type mice and homozygous B-hGCGR mice, as the antibody is crossly reactive with GCGR in human and mice. Human GCGR was exclusively detectable in homozygous B-hGCGR mice but not in wild type C57BL/6 mice.

Analysis of leukocytes cell subpopulation in B-hGCGR mice

from clipboard


Analysis of spleen leukocyte subpopulations by FACS
Splenocytes were isolated from female C57BL/6 and B-hGCGR mice (n=4, 7-week-old). Flow cytometry analysis of the splenocytes was performed to assess leukocyte subpopulations. A. Representative FACS plots. Single live cells were gated for CD45+ population and used for further analysis as indicated here. B. Results of FACS analysis. Percent of T cells, B cells, NK cells, dendritic cells, granulocytes, monocytes and macrophages in homozygous B-hGCGR mice were similar to those in the C57BL/6 mice, demonstrating that introduction of hGCGR in place of its mouse counterpart does not change the overall development, differentiation or distribution of these cell types in spleen. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.

Analysis of T cell subpopulation in B-hGCGR mice


from clipboard
Analysis of spleen T cell subpopulations by FACS
Splenocytes were isolated from female C57BL/6 and B-hGCGR mice (n=4, 7-week-old). Flow cytometry analysis of the splenocytes was performed to assess leukocyte subpopulations. A. Representative FACS plots. Single live CD45+ T cells were gated for CD3+ T cell population and used for further analysis as indicated here. B. Results of FACS analysis. Percent of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells and Tregs in homozygous B-hGCGR mice were similar to those in the C57BL/6 mice, demonstrating that introduction of hGCGR in place of its mouse counterpart does not change the overall development, differentiation or distribution of these T cell sub types in spleen. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.

Analysis of leukocytes cell subpopulation in B-hGCGR mice
from clipboard
Analysis of subpopulation of leukocytes in lymph node by FACS
Lymph node was isolated from female C57BL/6 and B-hGCGR mice (n=4, 7-week-old). Flow cytometry analysis of the lymph node was performed to assess leukocyte subpopulations. A. Representative FACS plots. Single live CD45+ T cells were used for further analysis as indicated here. B. Results of FACS analysis. Percent of T cells, B cells, and NK cells in homozygous B-hGCGR mice were similar to those in the C57BL/6 mice, demonstrating that introduction of hGCGR in place of its mouse counterpart does not change the overall development, differentiation or distribution of these cell types in lymph node. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.

Analysis of T cell subpopulation in B-hGCGR mice

from clipboard
Analysis of subpopulation of T cells in lymph node by FACS
Lymph node was isolated from female C57BL/6 and B-hGCGR mice (n=4, 7-week-old). Flow cytometry analysis of the lymph node was performed to assess leukocyte subpopulations. A. Representative FACS plots. Single live CD45+ T cells were used for further analysis as indicated here. B. Results of FACS analysis. Percent of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells and Tregs in homozygous B-hGCGR mice were similar to those in the C57BL/6 mice, demonstrating that introduction of hGCGR in place of its mouse counterpart does not change the overall development, differentiation or distribution of these T cell subtypes in lymph node. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.


Analysis of leukocytes cell subpopulation in B-hGCGR mice


from clipboard


Analysis of blood leukocyte subpopulations by FACS
Blood cells were isolated from female C57BL/6 and B-hGCGR mice (n=4, 7-week-old). Flow cytometry analysis of blood cells was performed to assess leukocyte subpopulations. A. Representative FACS plots. Single live cells were gated for CD45+ population and used for further analysis as indicated here. B. Results of FACS analysis. Percent of T cells, B cells, NK cells, dendritic cells, granulocytes, monocytes and macrophages in homozygous B-hGCGR mice were similar to those in the C57BL/6 mice, demonstrating that introduction of hGCGR in place of its mouse counterpart does not change the overall development, differentiation or distribution of these cell types in blood. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.

Analysis of T cell subpopulation in B-hGCGR mice

from clipboard


Analysis of subpopulation of T cells in blood by FACS
Blood cells were isolated from female C57BL/6 and B-hGCGR mice (n=4, 7-week-old). Flow cytometry analysis of blood cells was performed to assess leukocyte subpopulations. A. Representative FACS plots. Single live CD45+ T cells were used for further analysis as indicated here. B. Results of FACS analysis. Percent of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells and Tregs in homozygous B-hGCGR mice were similar to those in the C57BL/6 mice, demonstrating that introduction of hGCGR in place of its mouse counterpart does not change the overall development, differentiation or distribution of these T cell subtypes in lymph node. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.

In vivo efficacy of anti-human GCGR antibody with B-hGCGR mice

from clipboard


from clipboard


Experimental schedule for in vivo efficacy of anti-human GCGR antibody. Anti-human GCGR antibody-crotedumab (in house) was administered by intraperitoneal injection once a week on days 1 to 8. Blood were collected for analysis of blood glucose, insulin, glucagon and lipid on the days showed in the schematic diagram and the table. 


In vivo efficacy of anti-human GCGR antibody with B-hGCGR mice


from clipboard

Anti-human GCGR antibody reduces blood glucose in male B-hGCGR mice. 
A. Random blood glucose from male mice before and at multiple time points after injection of crotedumab (in house) or isotype control antibody (n = 6). B. Body weights. C. OGTT on day 4. D. Area under the curve for the OGTT shown in C. Serum levels of (E) insulin, (F) glucagon on Day 7. Anti-GCGR antibody reduced the random blood glucose, fasting blood glucose and OGTT compared to the isotype antibody in B-hGCGR mice. Serum levels of insulin was reduced slightly and glucagon level was significantly increased in the antibody treated group. All of the results in B-hGCGR mice were similar to those in the wild-type C57BL/6. 
Results indicated that the regulatory function on blood glucose in humanized B-hGCGR mice was similar to the wild-type C57BL/6. Anti-human GCGR antibody was efficacious in controlling blood glucose in B-hGCGR mice. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test. 


In vivo efficacy of anti-human GCGR antibody with B-hGCGR mice


from clipboard

Anti-human GCGR antibody improved lipid metabolism in male B-hGCGR mice. 

Wild-type C57BL/6 and B-hGCGR mice were treated with crotedumab (in house) or isotype control antibody (n = 6). Blood were collected on Day 11 for triglycerides and cholesterol analysis. Serum levels of TG (A) and TC (B). HDL-C (C) and LDL-C (D) levels in serum. Serum levels of TG was reduced, while TC, HDL-C and LDL-C were increased in the anti-human GCGR antibody treated male mice group compared to the isotype control. All of the results in B-hGCGR mice were similar to those in the wild-type C57BL/6. Results indicated that lipid metabolism in humanized B-hGCGR mice was similar to the wild-type C57BL/6. Results indicated that anti-human GCGR antibody was efficacious in controlling blood lipid in male B-hGCGR mice. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. TG, triglycerides; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol.  


In vivo efficacy of anti-human GCGR antibody with diet-induced obese (DIO) B-hGCGR mice




Anti-human GCGR antibody reduces blood glucose in DIO B-hGCGR mice. Male B-hGCGR mice were fed with high-fat diet throughout the study. Anti-human GCGR antibody crotedumab (in house) was administered by intraperitoneal injection on day 0 after diet-induced. Body weights, levels of blood glucose and hormones  were measured periodically (n = 10). A. Body weights. B. Random blood glucose from male mice before and at multiple time points after injection of crotedumab (in house) or isotype antibody. C. IPGTT on day 5. D. Area under the curve for the IPGTT shown in C. Serum levels of (E) insulin, (F) glucagon, (G) GLP-1 on Day 14 and Day 28. Anti-GCGR antibody significantly reduced body weight, random blood glucose and IPGTT compared to the isotype control in male DIO B-hGCGR mice. Serum levels of insulin, glucagon and GLP-1 were changed with dose-dependent. Results indicated that anti-human GCGR antibody was efficacious in controlling body weight and blood glucose in B-hGCGR mice. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. IPGTT, Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test. 


In vivo efficacy of anti-human GCGR antibody with diet-induced obese (DIO) B-hGCGR mice

Single doses of anti-human GCGR antibody treatment increased LDL-C and HDL-C in male DIO B-hGCGR mice. 
Male B-hGCGR mice were fed with high-fat diet throughout the study. Anti-human GCGR antibody crotedumab (in house) was administered by intraperitoneal injection on day 0 after diet-induced for 95 days (n = 10). Blood were collected on Day 28 for detecting the serum levels of TG (A), TC (B), HDL-C (C), LDL-C (D), ALT (E), AST (F). Serum levels of TG, ALT and AST in the three treatment groups were similar to that in the isotype group, while serum levels of HDL-C and LDL-C were significantly increased in the high dose treatment group compared to the isotype control. TC levels were also increased with dose-dependent, although with no significant difference. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. TG, triglycerides; TC, total cholesterol; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol. ALT,  alanine transaminase; AST,  aspartate aminotransferase.


In vivo efficacy of anti-human GCGR antibody with diet-induced obese (DIO) B-hGCGR mice


Single doses of anti-human GCGR antibody treatment induced α-cell hyperplasia  in male DIO B-hGCGR mice. 
Male B-hGCGR mice were fed with high-fat diet throughout the study. Anti-human GCGR antibody crotedumab (in house) was administered by intraperitoneal injection on day 0 after diet-induced for 95 days (n = 10). Pancreases were collected on Day 28 for morphometric analysis. (A) Glucagon and insulin immunohistochemistry of representative pancreas sections. α cell area (B) and β cell area (C) measured in (A). (D) Islet number per pancreas section. Results showed that α cell area was increased with dose dependent. Anti-human GCGR antibody had no effect on β cell area or islet number per pancreas area. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.